<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Product Feed Misuse &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/product-feed-misuse-part-2-243.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/product-feed-misuse-part-2-243.htm</link>
	<description>Online blog of Jason Dale, co-director of Loquax. My views on affiliate marketing, running a website and anything else that seems appropriate!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:57:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Redirected Products in Google Base - Affiliate Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/product-feed-misuse-part-2-243.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-24973</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Redirected Products in Google Base - Affiliate Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/04/product-feed-misuse-part-2.html#comment-24973</guid>
		<description>[...] opinion as it breaches Google&#039;s T&amp;C&#039;s and it was this kind of spamming that prompted Newitts to remove their product feed. Networks usually clamp down on reported affiliates for this and ask them to remove their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opinion as it breaches Google&#8217;s T&amp;C&#8217;s and it was this kind of spamming that prompted Newitts to remove their product feed. Networks usually clamp down on reported affiliates for this and ask them to remove their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/product-feed-misuse-part-2-243.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-10944</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/04/product-feed-misuse-part-2.html#comment-10944</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this Froogle spamming happening more and more often recently. It&#039;s this kind of trickery that reflects badly on the affiliate marketing industry and leads to all legitimate affiliates getting tarred with the same (grubby) brush - as in the case of the withdrawal of the Newitts datafeed.

Let&#039;s hope the networks are doing something to clamp down on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this Froogle spamming happening more and more often recently. It&#8217;s this kind of trickery that reflects badly on the affiliate marketing industry and leads to all legitimate affiliates getting tarred with the same (grubby) brush &#8211; as in the case of the withdrawal of the Newitts datafeed.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope the networks are doing something to clamp down on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/product-feed-misuse-part-2-243.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-10344</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/04/product-feed-misuse-part-2.html#comment-10344</guid>
		<description>Itâ€™s a shame it comes to removing the feed from all for what is basically one Affiliate if I am reading this correctly.

I have to say however that I was not aware of this type of misuse myself and you know me, I like to keep up with all kinds of tricks and underhand stuff to keep it at bay.

My prediction is that you will see a major shift this year towards, not wanting to play ball, we will have to remove the ball from you approaches but I would ideally like to see that done on a individual basis and not a everyone basis. Doing it to everyone just telling the world you have lost control of your program or have other motives behind removing the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itâ€™s a shame it comes to removing the feed from all for what is basically one Affiliate if I am reading this correctly.</p>
<p>I have to say however that I was not aware of this type of misuse myself and you know me, I like to keep up with all kinds of tricks and underhand stuff to keep it at bay.</p>
<p>My prediction is that you will see a major shift this year towards, not wanting to play ball, we will have to remove the ball from you approaches but I would ideally like to see that done on a individual basis and not a everyone basis. Doing it to everyone just telling the world you have lost control of your program or have other motives behind removing the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
