Google UK Gives Trademark Triggers The Bullet

7 Comments April 4, 2008 / Posted in Affiliate Marketing, Search

Google UK & Ireland have announced a major shake up to their trademark protection policy. Up until now a trademark owner could request that their mark was not used to trigger sponsored adwords when a search was made on Google. This is about to change! As of today Google UK & Ireland will no longer “review a term corresponding to the trademarked term as a keyword trigger”. This apparently brings this wing of Google in line with the US and Canada.

Full details about this policy revision can be found here.

In short it basically says all trademarks can now be used as triggers, but don’t mention the trademark in your advert copy.

So is this a good news or bad news?

It will be interesting to see how big brands react to these developments. Dixons for example are currently adwords free, but under these new terms it must be ok for competitors and affiliates of those competitors to bid on the trademark? Can Dixons therefore stop say Comet from bidding on ‘Dixons’ or even an electrical products affiliate from taking advantage?

For PPC affiliates it does open up a whole new market – and that could be good news for Google, after all could do with the extra cash. For closed groups (which perhaps may restrict one affiliate bidding on the brand name), it changes the whole landscape. Whilst one affiliate may be able to promote Merchant X directly with their brand name, this new decision essentially allows others to use the Merchant X trigger, but to potentially promote Merchant A, B and C!

From a trademark holder’s point of view it’s not the best news of the day and it will be interesting to see who takes advantage of this situation and if has any effect on traffic. It could mean for example we have to start running adword campaigns for the trademark, or countering any competitors by bidding on their names. There’s also the legal question of passing off – and lawyers could well be rubbing their hands about potential fights that may well kick off.

It could get quite ugly!

As of 5th May keywords that were disabled as a result of a trademark complaint and investigation will no longer be restricted in the UK and Ireland. There will no doubt be a lot of discussion, especially at legal level, between now and then about the implications of this policy change.

Related Posts...
Trademark Trigger Tantrums
Adwords & Trademark Triggers
Trademark Triggers You Will Go On My First Whistle!
Should We Be Worried About Google’s New TM Policy?
The Great Trademark Trigger Mystery!
submit to affiliates4u
7 Comments... What do you think? Subscribe via RSS
  1. Doug said on April 5th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    Why would they do it? What’s the reasoning?

    Doug

  2. Adrian said on April 6th, 2008 at 7:12 pm

    It’s a smart move. Trademarks and copyright in general confer far too much protection many times, and allowing an ad to be triggered by the keyword term, but not using the term itself in an ensuing list seems a fair comprimise. It was illogical that ppc results were barred but the organic results were somehow fine.

  3. [...] Google UK Gives Trademark Triggers The Bullet by Jason [...]

  4. [...] Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy Have just read Jason’s blog Google UK Gives Trademark Triggers The Bullet | One Little Duck – Affiliate Blog And have a thought. He says ‘under these new terms it must be ok for competitors and affiliates to [...]

  5. Reactions to the new Google trademark rules said on April 7th, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    [...] known affiliate Jason Dale thinks it could be good news for affiliates: For PPC affiliates it does open up a whole new market – and that could be good news for Google, [...]

  6. [...] been thinking about the new Google Trademark Trigger policy and how it will effect us as ‘Loquax’ is our trademark and as such we have used [...]

  7. [...] Posted by figleaf Have just read Jason’s blog Google UK Gives Trademark Triggers The Bullet | One Little Duck – Affiliate Blog And have a thought. He says ‘under these new terms it must be ok for competitors and affiliates to [...]