<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Application Denied and Partner Requests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/application-denied-and-partner-requests-273.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/application-denied-and-partner-requests-273.htm</link>
	<description>Online blog of Jason Dale, co-director of Loquax. My views on affiliate marketing, running a website and anything else that seems appropriate!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/application-denied-and-partner-requests-273.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-21857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/07/application-denied-and-partner-requests.html#comment-21857</guid>
		<description>It seems bizarre that, several years after this type of complaint was first made, that the major networks don&#039;t offer affiliates the opportunity to specify which of their domains they are using to apply to each program.

Surely, it isn&#039;t too hard to add a text box next to the &#039;Apply to this Merchant&#039; button where affiliates could add the domain they are using to apply.

The problem isn&#039;t really with affiliate managers - it&#039;s more the networks themselves that should facilitate this process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems bizarre that, several years after this type of complaint was first made, that the major networks don&#8217;t offer affiliates the opportunity to specify which of their domains they are using to apply to each program.</p>
<p>Surely, it isn&#8217;t too hard to add a text box next to the &#8216;Apply to this Merchant&#8217; button where affiliates could add the domain they are using to apply.</p>
<p>The problem isn&#8217;t really with affiliate managers &#8211; it&#8217;s more the networks themselves that should facilitate this process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/application-denied-and-partner-requests-273.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-21578</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/07/application-denied-and-partner-requests.html#comment-21578</guid>
		<description>I had a response from one network&#039;s affiliate support saying that &#039;Unfortunately this is a generic email that is set up by merchants which we cannot alter&quot; - which is utter tosh! They can change it if they wanted too (and if networks like Paid on Results can provide this kind of thing...). Surely a system that gets affiliates working with merchants is something worth altering too? 

The network goes on to say &quot;all websites should be assessed when reviewing your application so the process is done as fairly as possible&quot; - which is fine, but imo most reviews involve looking at the front page, and a lot of networks don&#039;t have provision for listing the various sites an affiliate may work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a response from one network&#8217;s affiliate support saying that &#8216;Unfortunately this is a generic email that is set up by merchants which we cannot alter&#8221; &#8211; which is utter tosh! They can change it if they wanted too (and if networks like Paid on Results can provide this kind of thing&#8230;). Surely a system that gets affiliates working with merchants is something worth altering too? </p>
<p>The network goes on to say &#8220;all websites should be assessed when reviewing your application so the process is done as fairly as possible&#8221; &#8211; which is fine, but imo most reviews involve looking at the front page, and a lot of networks don&#8217;t have provision for listing the various sites an affiliate may work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/application-denied-and-partner-requests-273.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-21543</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/07/application-denied-and-partner-requests.html#comment-21543</guid>
		<description>Via Cj you can set to veto any one based on territory, so If I donâ€™t want Chinese affiliates I can use auto decline, but I chose my territories wisely. But Jason, you make a valid point, not all Chinese affiliates are going to screw my client. So yes it should be on a case by case basis and perhaps we all need adopt this approach how ever time consuming it is.
A very good point indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via Cj you can set to veto any one based on territory, so If I donâ€™t want Chinese affiliates I can use auto decline, but I chose my territories wisely. But Jason, you make a valid point, not all Chinese affiliates are going to screw my client. So yes it should be on a case by case basis and perhaps we all need adopt this approach how ever time consuming it is.<br />
A very good point indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/application-denied-and-partner-requests-273.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-21458</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/07/application-denied-and-partner-requests.html#comment-21458</guid>
		<description>Good to see its not just me that gets annoyed by automated responses.

I received a rejection from one network recently, wasn&#039;t particularly bothered apart from the fact it was anonymous, so I sent a reply back indicating that I was more annoyed by the unsigned email than the rejection, couple of days later I received an acceptance email for the same program also unsigned, followed by an apology from the affiliate manager for rejecting me by mistake, they just don&#039;t get it do they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see its not just me that gets annoyed by automated responses.</p>
<p>I received a rejection from one network recently, wasn&#8217;t particularly bothered apart from the fact it was anonymous, so I sent a reply back indicating that I was more annoyed by the unsigned email than the rejection, couple of days later I received an acceptance email for the same program also unsigned, followed by an apology from the affiliate manager for rejecting me by mistake, they just don&#8217;t get it do they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.onelittleduck.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 03:50:23 -->
