<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Affiliate Agency Apology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/an-affiliate-agency-apology-297.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/an-affiliate-agency-apology-297.htm</link>
	<description>Online blog of Jason Dale, co-director of Loquax. My views on affiliate marketing, running a website and anything else that seems appropriate!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/an-affiliate-agency-apology-297.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-22034</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/09/an-affiliate-agency-apology.html#comment-22034</guid>
		<description>Hey Jason,

I think Kevin has picked up on a very important point when he states that many agencies take a back row seat when managing programs and let the networks be the voice for the program.  There are many agencies out there like the one I work for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluebarracuda.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blue Barracuda&lt;/a&gt; who prefer to get stuck in and make it known that we&#039;re managing the program and here to help.  I&#039;ve always been of the opinion that if I&#039;m charging a management fee then it should be me that doing the management, not pulling strings.  In the same way it&#039;s also my neck on the line when things don&#039;t work out - i&#039;m not one to hide behind a network :)

Cheers
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jason,</p>
<p>I think Kevin has picked up on a very important point when he states that many agencies take a back row seat when managing programs and let the networks be the voice for the program.  There are many agencies out there like the one I work for <a href="http://www.bluebarracuda.com" rel="nofollow">Blue Barracuda</a> who prefer to get stuck in and make it known that we&#8217;re managing the program and here to help.  I&#8217;ve always been of the opinion that if I&#8217;m charging a management fee then it should be me that doing the management, not pulling strings.  In the same way it&#8217;s also my neck on the line when things don&#8217;t work out &#8211; i&#8217;m not one to hide behind a network <img src='http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/an-affiliate-agency-apology-297.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-22014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/09/an-affiliate-agency-apology.html#comment-22014</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason

Cheque is indeed in the post...lol

Thanks for your kind words about us and link to our clients page.

We do constantly update our clients page and would welcome any comments you might have about information available.

I would also agree with Kevin that management agencies and personnel are showing their faces more often now and I believe that can only be good for the industry and affiliates. I would also like to mention that we do have contact details in any newsletters we may send out for merchants and also update our blog with merchant news.

I do think that you are right about agencies maybe adding contact details to the programmes they manage is a good idea and will endeavor to try and make sure that is part of our set up schedule when new merchants go live, and will also review existing programmes.

Well back to work for me and make sure that next year you don&#039;t have any problems deciding agency awards...lol

Take care

Cheers

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason</p>
<p>Cheque is indeed in the post&#8230;lol</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words about us and link to our clients page.</p>
<p>We do constantly update our clients page and would welcome any comments you might have about information available.</p>
<p>I would also agree with Kevin that management agencies and personnel are showing their faces more often now and I believe that can only be good for the industry and affiliates. I would also like to mention that we do have contact details in any newsletters we may send out for merchants and also update our blog with merchant news.</p>
<p>I do think that you are right about agencies maybe adding contact details to the programmes they manage is a good idea and will endeavor to try and make sure that is part of our set up schedule when new merchants go live, and will also review existing programmes.</p>
<p>Well back to work for me and make sure that next year you don&#8217;t have any problems deciding agency awards&#8230;lol</p>
<p>Take care</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/affiliate-marketing/an-affiliate-agency-apology-297.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-22007</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onelittleduck.co.uk/2007/09/an-affiliate-agency-apology.html#comment-22007</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

Some good name checks there.

One reason that agency relationships/involvement can be unclear is because they&#039;ve all involved themselves to differing amounts or had varying degrees of time to invest. 

Some agencies prefer networks to handle all communications but others (such as Equator who you&#039;ve name checked) like to get stuck in and enter into an &#039;equal&#039; relationship with the network.

Increasingly agencies are building dedicated affiliate teams (just a few years ago you&#039;d have to hunt quite hard to find one individual dedicated to affiliates) so I would guess you&#039;ll be hearing more of them as the industry matures.

Thanks,
Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>Some good name checks there.</p>
<p>One reason that agency relationships/involvement can be unclear is because they&#8217;ve all involved themselves to differing amounts or had varying degrees of time to invest. </p>
<p>Some agencies prefer networks to handle all communications but others (such as Equator who you&#8217;ve name checked) like to get stuck in and enter into an &#8216;equal&#8217; relationship with the network.</p>
<p>Increasingly agencies are building dedicated affiliate teams (just a few years ago you&#8217;d have to hunt quite hard to find one individual dedicated to affiliates) so I would guess you&#8217;ll be hearing more of them as the industry matures.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.onelittleduck.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 23:20:37 -->
